Page 65 - STATE v ARIF & ORS. SC-NO-540-2022 PART 1
P. 65

IN THE COURT OF SHRI DEEPAK SEHRAWAT, LD.  CMM
                                          PATIALA HOUSE COURTS, NEW DELHI




                           IN .THE  MATTER OF:



                           State


                                                        VERSUS

                                 Ahmad  Kawa                                 Respondent


                                                               F.I.R.  No.  688/2000
                                                               Dated  22.12.2000
                                                               U/S
                                                               302/307/186/353/121/121A/216/
                                                               201/420/468/471/474/120-B/34  of
                                                               Indian Penal  Code,  1860
                                                               Section  25/27 Arms Act,  1959
                                                               Section  14  Foreigners  Act,  1946  &
                                                               Section 4/5 Explosive Act,  1908
                                                               P.S.  - Kotwali Delhi
                                                                                1
     r:r V2--l' ~

      ft-)  l,pl'"""f-     APP.  ICATION  ON  BEHALF  OI"  APPLICANT                   ACCUSED  MR.

             WV\(.J~ "''~~ .             .
           (_!).~!" D·J..J h>J BI.L  L AHMAD KAWAI  FOR RELEASE OF JAMA TALASHI
           ~'q"1J r     ~ ~o...\,)1:.""~ L>-... ~-
           o  \-uJ\'  D""'   J_"'":                                '
           I"'-          ~T RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

                     c__J.tA~· That  the  petitioner  is  a  Citizen  of  India  and  is  thus,
                       'tf\-.'~   amenable  to  the  jurisdiction  of  this  Hon'ble  Court.  The
                             .


                                  present  petitioner  is  aggrieved  by  the  action(s)  of  the


                                  respondent.

                               2.  That  the  applicant  was  arrested·  by. ATS,  Gujarat  on


                                  10.01.2018 from  Delhi Airport and  then  handed  him  over to

                                  Special  Cell,  Delhi  in  relation  to  above  FIR.  At  the  time  of


                                  the·  arrest  of .the  applicant  a  personal  search  memo  was


                                  prepared the fo)towing properties/documents were seized:

                                                  1.    One Mobile phone


                                                 2.     One Debit Card

                                                 3.     One Credit Card


                                                 4.     One Driver License       /      ~
                                                                   '•'>- . .....___--------
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70