Page 93 - STATE v ARIF & ORS. SC-NO-540-2022 PART 1

M """V\ •, A '?-h ..... -y ... "Y\ "'
IN THE COURT OF SH. B:i' •· P' I !iiiFB i\ ; 'H, CMM (NDD),
PATIALA HOUSE COURTS, NEW DELHI
Case FIR No. 688 dated 22.12.2000 u/s 302/307/353/186/201/121/216/468/420/471/ 474/120-
J{~'A. PC, 14 Foreigners Act, 4/5 Explosive Substances Act & 25/27 Arms Act, PS Kotwali,
DC_
· · State Vs. Bilal Ahmad Kawa s/o Ali Mohammad Kawa
rio Qutubuddin Pora, PS M.R.Ganj, Aali Kadal,
Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir.
Subject: Request for issuing directions to the Director FSL for providing FSL
results in the case, on priority.

Hon 'ble Sir,

The brief facts of the case are that on 22.12.2000, an incidence of firing/attack in the Red
Fort, Delhi by the terrorists of banned terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT), who armed
with AK-56/47 rifles entered into Red Fort and fired of the security forces, deployed in the
security of the Red Fort. Total three army personnel died in the incidence. On the same day, the
terrorist organization, Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) has claimed for the above mentioned attack on
Red Fort. Accordingly, the above mentioned case vide FIR No. 688/2000 dt. 22.12.2000, was
registered at PS Kotwali, Delhi. Subsequently, the investigation of the case has been transferred
to Special Cell, Delhi. During the investigation of the case, earlier total 11 accused were
arrested. However, all the accused persons have been acquitted/discharges by the Hon'ble
Trial/appellant courts, except one accused namely Ashfag Ahmed @ Abu Hamaap @ Mohd.
Arif rio. Pakistan, whose death penalty was confirmed by the Hon'ble High Court and later on
by the Apex court on I 0.8.20 11. In this· case, several accused persons including the above
mentioned accused Bilal Ahmed Kawa, were declared as PO by the concerned court of Sh. A.K.
Sarpal, MM, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi vide orders dated 04.05.2001.

Later on, the present accused namely Bilal Ahmed Kawa RIO Srinagar, Jammu Kashmir,
was arrested in the case on 10.01.2018, who is presently on bail vide orders dated 07.02.2018 of
the Hon'ble court of Sh. Sidhatih Sharma, ASJ (FTC), Patiala House Courts, Delhi. During the
investigation of the case, some exhibits i.e. mobile/SIM card and handwritings of the accused
were sent to the FSL/Rohini, Delhi for extracting the data and expert opinion, vide their
acknowledgement Nos. FSL-2018/DOC-2512 dated 28.03.18 (In Documents Section) and
FSL/2018/CFU-2458 dated 27.03.18 (In Computer Section). In this regard, results from the
Documents Section has been received, but despite of various {total 10 nos.) requests and priority
letters ( latest dated 30.08.19), result related to the mobile/SIM has not been provided by the
concerned authorities from Computer Section ofFSL/Rohini, Delhi.
In view of the above, it is humbly prayed that directions may please be issued to the
Director, FSL, Govt. of NCT Delhi, Rohini, New Delhi, for providing the result in the case on
priority, so that the charge sheet against the accused, may be filed in this Hon'ble court at the
earliest.
(Dolm-~~
Prayed accordingly,

lnspr./Spl Cell/SWR,
Janak Puri, New Delhi.