Page 313 - STATE v ARIF & ORS. SC-NO-540-2022 PART 1

:-r~·>
\' -·
Ja

I!lSp. ~urender Kumar Operation Cell AShok Vihar Delhi

....

On 23.3.2001 I received. ·orders for executing the
) process u;s 82/83 CrPC against the ·accused 5abir @.5abarullah
~~
r/o t 5123 IIIrd Floor, Sari f Manzil Ballimaran Delhi. Ori ·same
'
!rt:_ .. '
;
'- day the one copy of process u/s 82 CrPC affixed on· the notice
board of the oourt and other copy affixed on the residerce of

the accused. The order was read out in rubli.c. The report is

EX P•l•
on 24.4.2001 I again went to the house of accused S.all>ir
I
I>
@ Sabarullah at r/o 5123 3rd floor S.arid Manzi.l Ballimaran Delhl:'--c
to execute the process u/s 83 CrPC. The accused was rot found

there as he was rasi.din;J as a tenant, and left the place: There
. '\
is tx) moveable Or immoveable property in the name Of the 2CCuSed.

~ I ~2d,e the. DD er<try no. 17 on 24.3.2001 regarding the oompliance __ _,..
~der of executing the process ujs 82 CrPC. The report
of 83 CrPC is ex. P-3.

Both reports are treex and oorrect and bears my signature at r:ol.nt
_,
.l
A. i j,
--~' i

R .0 .A .C • M .M .: DELHI

.4.5 .2001
'' .
. I
-1~
..
j;_
i
. ,/
I
i-
1
,.
. ~.
I
~l-h

. _f{l ..

•

.. ~-~
··-· .
::~~.~-' ~.