Page 10 - STATE v ARIF & ORS. SC-NO-540-2022 PART 1
P. 10

1'11\'lfi!l\'11 •ih·llctii :s iii~
                                                                                             ~q,liiiomm~ftntrr

                                                                                            ~fu'ffi(~): ~~it;
                                                                                          :J&! ~ 31iftq;o<\; -~ ~­
                                                                                          'lit 31Giffi! ij"" Wl'l 'ifllrnl"'""" F;>n,
                                                                                          ""' ~ it;~ 'f( ~W-I
                                                                                                  '!litffi
                                                                                          firmR1 '¥'"" f<;>n I
                                                                                            ~- 'lit 31Giffi! ij 1J'1"T! it; ~ W-1
                                                                                          ~W'""f<;>njil; 31Giffi!'iloil"ll'!'lil
                                                                                          ~ m% l'll'!>'l\'1 it;-'lit '!Rt
                                                                                          W'lR1 'ill"'~ 'lmirl % 011'>:-.;; >it ;<1
                                                                                          ~il...-;~%1
                                                                                            llP<i-oir<ft it;~ 'f( '\!<~ ]lt!
                                                                                          ~ <m 'it '1W B '11( I -  ~ '¥' K-il
                                                                                          ""' .w-it '~ ,.m it; t\11:( "'"
                                                                                          '111'$!;] <:'\ 'lit oft I W-f amT '111'$!;] ij %1
                                                                                          'l1 iii; '!im; 'f( """" -.;f.! 'l1B 3!f~ 'lit
                                                                                          flRT ,~it;"" '1'11  'l1  31<!:  ~
                                                                                          ~ .rr·,.,..;~"!!l( l;'l1'111'$!;Jil;""""
                                                                                          il~ ~ 31'11 ""'~ 3MR<:'!m'lil% 1





















          Red Fort shoot-out
            accused creates

            ruckus in court



          NEW  DELHI,  March  20.  -
          The  prime  suspect  in  the  Red
          Fo[t  shoot·out  case  today  cre-
          ated  ruckus during proceedings
          in  the  court  of  the  additional
          sessions judge, Mr M S Sabhar-
          wal  at the Tis Hazari courts and
          said  that  he  wouid  not get  jus-
          tice from the court. The suspect,
          Arif  alias  Ashfaq  had  filed  an
          application  on  6  March  de-
          manding  removal  of  shackles
          and fisticuffs. At present, Arif is
          lodged in Tihar jail.
           The  incident  took  place  as
          soon  as  the  court  proceedings
          began. Arif shouted demanding
          removal of his chains and added
          that he was not being given jus-
          uce oniy because he was a Pakis-
          tani.  He added  that  there were
          other suspects in  the Parliament
          attack  case  and  thcv  were  not
          treated as  harshly as· he and his
          wife. Arif's wife Rchmana Yusuf
          Farooqui  is  a co-accused  in  lhc
          case.
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15